Национальный цифровой ресурс Руконт - межотраслевая электронная библиотека (ЭБС) на базе технологии Контекстум (всего произведений: 683835)
Контекстум

A history of British India To the union of the old and new companies under the Earl of Godolphin's award. Vol. 2 (290,00 руб.)

0   0
ИздательствоLongmans Green and co.
Страниц328
ID88686
A history of British India To the union of the old and new companies under the Earl of Godolphin's award. Vol. 2 / by Sir William Wilson Hunter .— : Longmans Green and co., 1900 .— 328 с. — Lang: eng .— URL: https://rucont.ru/efd/88686 (дата обращения: 14.11.2025)

Предпросмотр (выдержки из произведения)

A HISTORY of BRITISH INDIA. <...> TO THE UNION OF THE OLD AND NEW COMPANIES UNDER THE EARL OF GODOLPHIN'S AWARD LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. LONDON, NEW YORK, AND BOMBAY 1900. <...> When Sir William Hunter, on January 24, 1900, penned the last words of Chapter VIII. in the present volume it was little realised, either by himself or his friends, that the shadow of death had already fallen across his path. <...> Moreover, a 'Life' is in preparation, which has been entrusted to the capable hands of Mr. F. H. Skrine, late of the Bengal Civil Service, and it would therefore be at once premature and unnecessary to anticipate the task he has undertaken. <...> As the darkest period of the Company's history, that of the seventeenth century, was reconstructed and illuminated from the manuscript records of the India Office, Sir William Hunter determined that the results were of sufficient interest and importance to justify a narrative on a more extended scale. <...> At first it was decided to publish the volume as it stood, without the addition of a single word; but Sir William Hunter had left a rough outline sketch of what the next chapter was to be, together with abundant material, either collected by himself or amassed under his immediate direction, 2 A HISTORY OF BRITISH INDIA INTRODUCTION and eventually it was resolved to use that material so far as to carry on the history to a convenient terminal date. <...> But there would have been no political ascendency for us at all, had not the humbler task been well and thoroughly performed. <...> We have too long fostered the notion that our Indian Empire was an unconscious lapse into greatness. <...> The historian who attempts to work from primary sources has frequently to combat generalisations, more brilliant than sound, which have 3 A HISTORY OF BRITISH INDIA INTRODUCTION crystallised into hard-and-fast traditions. <...> Nothing great that has ever been done by Englishmen was done so unintentionally, so accidentally as the conquest of India.' It seems an invidious task to breathe even a word of criticism against a writer <...>
A_history_of_British_India_To_the_union_of_the_old_and_new_companies_under_the_Earl_of_Godolphin's_award._Vol._2.pdf
A HISTORY of BRITISH INDIA. By Sir William Wilson Hunter, K.C.S.I., M.A., LL.D, a VicePresident of the Royal Asiatic Society VOLUME II. TO THE UNION OF THE OLD AND NEW COMPANIES UNDER THE EARL OF GODOLPHIN'S AWARD LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. LONDON, NEW YORK, AND BOMBAY 1900.
Стр.1
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. .................................................................... 2 CHAPTER I. THE COMPANY AND THE KING. 1623-1649....................................................... 12 CHAPTER II. OUR FIRST SETTLEMENTS ON THE BOMBAY COAST.1607 — 1658.................. 37 CHAPTER III. OUR FIRST SETTLEMENTS ON THE MADRAS COAST. 1611-1658...................... 57 CHAPTER IV. OUR FIRST SETTLEMENTS ON THE BENGAL COAST. 1633 — 1658 .................. 71 CHAPTER V. THE COMPANY AND THE COMMONWEALTH. 1649-1660.................. 85 CHAPTER VI. THE COMPANY'S SERVANTS AND TRADE TO 1660......................................... 130 CHAPTER VII. THE COMPANY UNDER THE RESTORATION. 1660 — 1688.................. 156 CHAPTER VIII. THE COMPANY AND PARLIAMENT. 1688-1698.................................................... 234 CHAPTER IX. STRIFE AND UNION OF THE COMPANIES. 1698-1708........................... 276 1
Стр.2
INTRODUCTION. There is something pathetic in the publication of a posthumous work. The pathos is deepened in the case of a writer suddenly called away in the midst of apparent health and vigour, as he stands on the threshold of a great literary undertaking. When Sir William Hunter, on January 24, 1900, penned the last words of Chapter VIII. in the present volume it was little realised, either by himself or his friends, that the shadow of death had already fallen across his path. Yet so it was. A fortnight later he was lying dead — his end so sudden, so calm, and so mercifully wrapped in the sleep of unconsciousness that he had no time to give more than a bare hint of his wishes as to the book he had left incomplete. Of the man himself and his work this is not the place to speak. Innumerable tributes to his memory, both in the English and Indian Press, are still fresh in the public recollection. Moreover, a 'Life' is in preparation, which has been entrusted to the capable hands of Mr. F. H. Skrine, late of the Bengal Civil Service, and it would therefore be at once premature and unnecessary to anticipate the task he has undertaken. It remains to say something as to the publication of this volume. In the original scheme of the work it was to end with the battle of Plassey; but gradually this plan was modified. As the darkest period of the Company's history, that of the seventeenth century, was reconstructed and illuminated from the manuscript records of the India Office, Sir William Hunter determined that importance to justify a narrative on a more extended scale. The exact date for the conclusion of the volume had not been finally fixed when death stayed the hand of the writer. Chapters I. to VII. were already set up in proof, while Chapter VIII. existed in manuscript only. At first it was decided to publish the volume as it stood, without the addition of a single word; but Sir William Hunter had left a rough outline sketch of what the next chapter was to be, together with abundant material, either collected by himself or amassed under his immediate direction, 2 the results were of sufficient interest and
Стр.3
A HISTORY OF BRITISH INDIA INTRODUCTION and eventually it was resolved to use that material so far as to carry on the history to a convenient terminal date. Such a date was obviously afforded by the union of the two Companies under the provisions of the Earl of Godolphin's Award in 1708, and Chapter IX. has therefore been added to round off the volume. For the form and arrangement of that concluding portion Sir William Hunter is in no way responsible, and any imperfections of style or matter that may be found (of which there are probably only too many) are not to be attributed to his pen. Though he unhappily only lived to carry out a fragment of his original design, yet it may be said that Hunter has left a complete account of one great section of our history in India — the struggle for and attainment of commercial supremacy in the seventeenth century. Speaking generally, this was the achievement of the old London Company. The work of the great United Company, founded in 1708, was to establish our political ascendency. But there would have been no political ascendency for us at all, had not the humbler task been well and thoroughly performed. Nor must we attempt to draw too dogmatically the line of demarcation between the periods thus roughly characterised. The one shades into the other by almost imperceptible gradations, and we shall find that, even in the early period covered by this volume, the English in India were not without occasional premonitions of the great destiny awaiting them. The once firmly-rooted conviction that our real history in India began about 1746 is dying hard. It was due partly to an accidental cause. The events of that time were related with marvellous accuracy of detail and unique charm of style by a consummate military historian. But the bright light focussed by the genius of Orme on the Anglo-French struggle in India of the eighteenth century has not only somewhat lifted that period out of its proper perspective, but has deepened by contrast the shadow on the years that went before. We have too long fostered the notion that our Indian Empire was an unconscious lapse into greatness. The historian who attempts to work from primary sources has frequently to combat generalisations, more brilliant than sound, which have 3
Стр.4
A HISTORY OF BRITISH INDIA INTRODUCTION crystallised into hard-and-fast traditions. Thus the late Professor Seeley writes: 'Our acquisition of India was made blindly. Nothing great that has ever been done by Englishmen was done so unintentionally, so accidentally as the conquest of India.' It seems an invidious task to breathe even a word of criticism against a writer from whom we have all learnt so much. But fallacy must inevitably lurk in the attempt to sum up in a single sentence the motives and tendencies of a century and a half. To prove how seriously this statement needs qualification, we have only to point to the fact that as early as 1687 the Court of Directors hoped, in their own words, to lay the foundation of a 'large, well-grounded sure English dominion in India for all time to come.' Of course they by no means always wrote or acted up to the full height of this conception. They aimed, as Seeley truly points out, at a commercial rather than a political ascendency; but in no sense did the Company act 'blindly.' It set itself from the first most consciously and deliberately to acquire the bulk of the Indo-European trade. The truth is better expressed in Captain Mahan's description of the English and Dutch colonial and mercantile policy as a whole. Both peoples, he says, 'in their native country and abroad, whether settled in the ports of civilised nations or of barbarous Eastern rulers or in colonies of their own foundation . . . everywhere strove to draw out all the resources of the land, to develope and increase them.' This is eminently true of our work in India; we strove to draw out all the resources of the land. But the political and economic condition of the Mughal Empire was such that a domination over the Indo-European trade inevitably brought with it a large measure of political and territorial power. It would have been madness to grasp the sceptre too soon. That was the fatal rock on which the French Companies were lured to destruction. Though a trading company might acquire an empire, we may be sure it could only do so by trading, i.e. by a vigorous and unimpeded exercise of its own proper function. Militarism is a dangerous weapon in the hands of a Chartered Company — at least, in the early stages of its history. In the main therefore the Directors, that much-abused body of men, were moved by a sound instinct in their 4
Стр.5