Национальный цифровой ресурс Руконт - межотраслевая электронная библиотека (ЭБС) на базе технологии Контекстум (всего произведений: 683130)
Контекстум

Thomas Carlyle A history of the first forty years of his life : 1795-1835: In 2 vol. Vol. 2 (290,00 руб.)

0   0
ИздательствоLongmans Green a. co.
Страниц391
ID85606
Thomas Carlyle A history of the first forty years of his life : 1795-1835: In 2 vol. Vol. 2 .— : Longmans Green a. co., 1896 .— 391 с. — Lang: eng .— URL: https://rucont.ru/efd/85606 (дата обращения: 11.11.2025)

Предпросмотр (выдержки из произведения)

THOMAS CARLYLE. <...> WITH PORTRAITS AND ETCHINGS NEW EDITION LONGMANS GREEN AND CO. LONDON AND BOMBAY 1896 All rights reserved Printed by BALLANTYNE, HANSON & CO. At the Ballantyne Press JANE WELSH CARLYLE (From miniature in a possession of J. A. Froude, Esq.) CONTENTS CHAPTER I. A.D. 1828. ÆT.33. 2 CHAPTER II. <...> Goethe had said of Carlyle that he was fortunate in having in himself an originating principle of conviction, out of which he could develop the force that lay in him unassisted by other men. <...> Goethe had discerned what had not yet become articulately clear to Carlyle himself. <...> We have arrived at a period when he had become master of his powers, when he is an distinctly to utter the 'poor message,' as he sometimes called it, which he had to deliver to his contemporaries. <...> The secret of a man's nature lies in his religion, in what he really believes about this world, and his own place in it. <...> We have seen him confessing to Irving that he did not believe, as his friend did, in the Christian religion, and that it was vain to hope that he ever would so believe. <...> He tells his mother, and he so continued to tell her as long as she lived, that their belief was essentially the same, although their language was different. <...> Historical religions, Christianity included, he believed to have been successive efforts of humanity, loyally and nobly made in the light of existing knowledge, to explain human duty, and to insist on the fulfilment of it; and the reading of the moral constitution and position of man, in the creed, for instance, of his own family, he believed to be truer far, incommensurably truer, than was to be found in the elaborate metaphysics of utilitarian ethics. <...> In revelation, technically so called, revelation confirmed by historical miracles, he was unable to believe — he felt himself forbidden to believe — by the light that was in him <...>
Thomas_Carlyle_A_history_of_the_first_forty_years_of_his_life__1795-1835_In_2_vol._Vol._2.pdf
THOMAS CARLYLE. A HISTORY OF THE FIRST FORTY YEARS OF HIS LIFE. 1795-1835 BY JAMES ANTHONY FROUDE, M.A FORMERLY FELLOW OF EXETER COLLEGE, OXFORD IN TWO VOLUMES VOL. II. WITH PORTRAITS AND ETCHINGS NEW EDITION LONGMANS GREEN AND CO. LONDON AND BOMBAY 1896 All rights reserved Printed by BALLANTYNE, HANSON & CO. At the Ballantyne Press
Стр.1
JANE WELSH CARLYLE (From miniature in a possession of J. A. Froude, Esq.)
Стр.2
CONTENTS CHAPTER I. A.D. 1828. ÆT.33. CHAPTER II. A.D. 1828. ÆT. 33. CHAPTER III. A.D. 1829. ÆT. 34. CHAPTER IV. A.D. 1830. ÆT. 35. 2 20 36 56 EXTRACTS FROM A DIARY KEPT AT CRAIGENPUTTOCK. 57 CHAPTER V. A.D. 1830. ÆT. 35. CHAPTER VI. A.D. 1830. ÆT. 35. CHAPTER VII. A.D. 1831. ÆT. 36. CHAPTER VIII. A.D. 1831. ÆT. 36. EXTRACTS FROM CARLYLE'S NOTE BOOK, BEGUN IN CHAPTER IX. A.D. 1831. ÆT. 36. LONDON 1831. CHAPTER X. A.D. 1831. ÆT. 36 CHAPTER XI. A.D. 1832. ÆT. 37. CHAPTER XII. A.D. 1832. ÆT. 37. EXTRACTS FROM JOURNAL. CHAPTER XIII. A.D. 1832. ÆT. 37. CHAPTER XIV. A.D. 1833 ÆT 38. EXTRACTS FROM JOURNAL. CHAPTER XV. A.D. 1833. ÆT.38. CHAPTER XVI. A.D. 1833. ÆT. 38. CHAPTER XVII. A.D. 1834. ÆT. 39. CHAPTER XVIII. A.D. 1834. ÆT. 39. EXTRACTS FROMJOURNAL. 79 98 109 127 127 156 180 190 217 232 243 269 269 288 301 322 347 347 1
Стр.3
CHAPTER I. A.D. 1828. ÆT.33. Goethe had said of Carlyle that he was fortunate in having in himself an originating principle of conviction, out of which he could develop the force that lay in him unassisted by other men. Goethe had discerned what had not yet become articulately clear to Carlyle himself. But it is no less true that this principle of conviction was already active in his mind, underlying his thoughts on every subject which he touched. It is implied everywhere, though nowhere definitely stated in his published writings. We have arrived at a period when he had become master of his powers, when he is an distinctly to utter the 'poor message,' as he sometimes called it, which he had to deliver to his contemporaries. From this time his opinions on details might vary, but the main structure of his philosophy remained unchanged. It is desirable, therefore, before pursuing further the story of his life, to describe briefly what the originating principle was. The secret of a man's nature lies in his religion, in what he really believes about this world, and his own place in it. What was Carlyle's religion? I am able to explain it, partly from his conversations with myself, but happily not from this source only, into which alien opinions might too probably intrude. There remain among his unpublished papers the fragments of two unfinished essays which he was never able to complete satisfactorily to himself, but which he told me were, and had been, an imperfect expression of his actual thoughts. We have seen him confessing to Irving that he did not believe, as his friend did, in the Christian religion, and that it was vain to hope that he ever would so believe. He tells his mother, and he so continued to tell her as long as she lived, that their belief was essentially the same, although their language was Calvinist without things — that different. Both these statements were true. He was a the theology. The materialistic theory of intellect is a phenomenon of matter, that conscience is the growth of social convenience, and other 2
Стр.4
THOMAS CARLYLE. CHAPTER I kindred speculations, he utterly repudiated. Scepticism on the nature of right and wrong, as on man's responsibility to his Maker, never touched or tempted him. On the broad facts of the Divine government of the universe he was as well assured as Calvin himself; but he based his faith, not on a supposed revelation, or on fallible human authority. He had sought the evidence for it, where the foundations lie of all other forms of knowledge, in the experienced facts of things interpreted by the intelligence of man. Experienced fact was to him revelation, and the only true revelation. Historical religions, Christianity included, he believed to have been successive efforts of humanity, loyally and nobly made in the light of existing knowledge, to explain human duty, and to insist on the fulfilment of it; and the reading of the moral constitution and position of man, in the creed, for instance, of his own family, he believed to be truer far, incommensurably truer, than was to be found in the elaborate metaphysics of utilitarian ethics. In revelation, technically so called, revelation confirmed by historical miracles, he was unable to believe — he felt himself forbidden to believe — by the light that was in him. In other ages men had seen miracles where there were none, and had related them in perfect good faith in their eagerness to realise the divine presence in the world. They did not know enough of nature to be on their guard against alleged suspensions of its unvarying order. To Carlyle the universe was itself a miracle, and all its phenomena were equally in themselves incomprehensible. But the special miraculous occurrences of sacred history were not credible to him. 'It is as certain as mathematics,' he said to me late in his own life, 'that no such thing ever has been or can be. 'He had learnt that effects succeeded causes uniformly and inexorably without intermission or interruption, and that tales of wonder were as little the true accounts of real occurrences as the theory of epicycles was a correct explanation of the movements of the planets. So far his thoughts on this subject did not differ widely from those of his sceptical contemporaries, but his further conclusions not only were not their conclusions, but were opposed to them by whole diameters; for while he rejected the literal narrative of the sacred writers, he believed as strongly as 3
Стр.5